Header image

How do we, as a society, slow down abortion rates? How do we teach girls not to get pregnant? The answer is not condoms (though they are condemned by the Catholic Church because they stop the natural process of procreation, they do, statistically speaking, lower birthrates), anti-abortion laws, or pamphlets. The answer is not protesting clinics or PSAs or books. The answer is not marching in Washington or teaching kids the horrors of ridding the innocent. All of these things are extremely helpful, and have assisted in lowering pregnancies and abortions, but if we wish to substantially lower the sex rate, we have to teach our youth how to view true love and the importance of abstinence in a romantic relationship.

The first place to start this process is the media. Movies, television shows, music, and even some books preach that dating automatically implies sexual contact. It is on the increase, where if a couple is asked if they have sex, and they reply no, they are either lying, one of them is homosexual, or they are strange. The media teaches young men and young women to view females as sexual objects to toy with. Women get little to no respect from the men they date because many men are attracted to women for what they can obtain: temporary physical pleasure as a result of an orgasm. The media also teaches that sex has no consequence: no one comes away emotionally traumatized, no one gets pregnant, and STD’s are nonexistent. Romantic love does come in a physical form; after all, it is one of the main differences between a suitor and a friend, but what if the director of a new film decided to have the couple in the movie abstain till marriage? What if there were more romantic self-help books that spoke that abstinence was a good thing in a relationship? What if music stopped singing about a woman’s physical form and more about love and happiness? Not every sexual relationship has bad results; there are plenty that are “experienced” that will be happy to tell their peers otherwise. Yet, if the media used its carte blanche for the power of good instead of money, many more women would say no when pressured, and men would treat females as human beings with emotions and needs; women would also learn to view themselves this way.

The first step is in the media. The second step is to change the warped view of teenagers and young adults, especially in the academic curriculum in sexual education. The distribution of condoms sends the message, “I do not expect you, as young adults, to make proper and appropriate choices; therefore, I will teach you how to avoid the consequences.” Young adults are not stupid; they are not bad; they are, among other things, a reflection of the expectations put upon them by those they look up to and respect. “Impressionable minds live up to the expectations placed on them”; when the expectation is average and that they do not have the ability of self-control, they will reflect it and use what they learn in school in the backseat of the car or in the bedroom. If teachers and principals were to expect students to behave responsibly in the case of drugs, alcohol, and texting while driving, why not have the same expectation when comes to sex? Drugs and alcohol are appealing because they change the behavior of neurotransmitters (chemical messengers that allow nerves to communicate at their junctions) and impair perpetual skills in the brain. Texting and driving is dangerous because it takes the driver’s eyes of the road and shifts focus from driving to texting. A sexual relationship is not as condemned, even though it is just as deadly! Sexually Transmitted Diseases can result in major uncomfortable physical traumas, sterilization, and even death. In addition to deaths caused by STD’s, there are deaths of innocent souls, those who have not seen the light of day or their mother’s face. Those who have been aborted.

The third step, and possibly the most important is specifically for parents. Fathers or mothers who leave the household set their children up for much despair. In the words of Chris Rock, “My relationship with my daughter is going to affect her relationship with men for the rest of her life…Sometimes I’m walking with my daughter, talking with my daughter, and I just realize that my only job in life is to keep her off the pole. They don’t grade fathers, but if your daughter is a stripper, you [messed] up.” Both young females and males want nothing more than love; when they feel abandoned at home, they search for it somewhere else. Usually in the form of a relationship with the opposite gender, they look to fill a void. When finding a “sweetie,” a “hottie”, a sense of lust and loss come in to play. There is a loss of security, a loss of the sense of self. And that is just with civil divorces! At best, the parents still respect each other and treat the children just as they did before. At worst, the parents become hateful and cruel towards each other, and show their children this side of themselves; even encourage it in their children! Their children, wanting some sense of love and security, go to someone, anyone, who says that they will love them, and go as far, sometimes much farther sexually then they want; however, sometimes, it is best to come from a “broken home.” Truly, the real broken homes are the ones who tolerate their children, the ones who treat their children as dolls or property, instead of human beings. A family can be “intact” and yet abusive. The lesson is to treat children as humans to be respected and adored, not as luggage to be tossed around. The rest will take care of itself.

The last thing that can contribute to less sex in the country would be the value of religion and marriage. Religion has been downgraded in favor of “political correctness”; morals have been forgotten, and have been replaced with a “fear of offending.” This is not to say that those who do not belong to an organized religion are immoral or unethical, but American society has censored itself when it comes to religious morals, and replaced it with what the public wants to hear. It is no secret that most religions condemn sex before marriage, as stated in the Bible, “Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.” (Hebrews 13:4). This era is the sensitivity era, where even the mention of Jesus Christ is enough to send people into convulsions of rage. Many churches, desperate for members, change the messages to fit the wants of the people, instead of stating what God wants from his children: sexual abstinence from His children. This generation has also an intense fear of marriage and divorce due to unhealthy homes and leans more toward cohabitation and less towards marriage. According to the book Sex in America, married couples achieve these five basic yet important things: health, financial security, long life, sense of well-being, and a happy sex life. “Because marriage is the capstone of commitment in the relationship, it adds a deeper sense of internal security to one’s sex life. Married couples are more likely to perceive love and sex as intrinsically connected.”

The argument against abortion is as old as the practice. There are “moral” and “practical” reasons for both sides. In the end, nothing matters, not the morality, not the religious aspect, not the financial problems a new baby will cause, not the permanent reminder of a one-night stand or a rape, but the fact that a baby, an innocent, sinless child will never see the light of day, will never laugh, will never sing, never experience love, and most importantly, will never experience God’s love. How can society say killing is wrong and yet promote it to those who are an “inconvenience?” All children are time-consuming and expensive. All children require physical and emotional input. But what about to those mothers who cannot afford it? Contact with the local church or Pregnancy Lifeline will help set up medical care, a listening and non-judgmental ear, and an opportunity for a better life via adoption. Some options include:

Hope’s Promise: 1-800-294-3930; http://www.hopespromise.com/i-am-pregnant/

Birthline Lifeline 24-Hour Hotline (West Palm Beach, FL but could refer callers to other states and cities’ equivalents) : 1-561-278-0880; http://www.diocesepb.org/charities/birthline.htm

Abortion is wrong, plain and simple. The cost of sacrificing an inconvenience comes at the cost of sacrificing an innocent babe. The trick to lower abortion rates is not to preach on the immortality of it. Pamphlets, books, talks, etc. help lower rates of abortion; however, the real answer is to lower sex rates and increase respect among males and females. When the public changes its ways about sex and marriage, an incline in the positive aspects of society will increase; “When marriages and families are healthy, communities thrive-and when marriages break down, communities break down.”

Works Cited:

SAMA. “SAMA – The Effect of Drugs on the Adolescent Brain | SAMA Foundation.” SAMA Foundation | All Children Should Be Able to Reach Their Full Potential…. 2008-2010. Web. 08 Jan. 2012.

.

“What Does the Bible Say about Sex before Marriage?” Bible Questions Answered. Got Questions Ministries, 2002-2012. Web. 08 Jan. 2012.

.

“Alcohol.” TeensHealth. Nemours, 1995-2012. Web. 08 Jan. 2012. .

Garth, Lakita. The Naked Truth. Ventura, CA: Regal, 2007. Print.

Meier, Katie. A Girl’s Guide to Life: The Real Dish on Growing Up, Being True, and Making Your Teen Years Fabulous! Nashville, TN: Transit, 2004. Print.

The British government agency governing advertising on television (The Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice) is now allowing private abortion clinics to advertise their “services”. Under the new decision, non-profit private abortion clinics can advertise on TV and for-profit ones can advertise on all other forms of media. In order to advertise on television, abortion clinics have to promote an “array of services”. However, pro-lifers of America have seen the drastic consequences of Planned Parenthood’s “reproductive health services” wordplay, and I’m not convinced that there are safeguards to keep abortion from being the key advertised service on British TV. With abortion being advertised on TV, I also fear that it could creep even further into homes and families of the UK.

(Source – The Northern Virginia Daily: http://apne.ws/zicXU0)

More and more American citizens are choosing to cite their consciences when they make political decisions, such as choosing a presidential candidate. Proof of this can be found in the March for Life effort in D.C., which is coming up this Monday, January 3. This coming-together of people shows that many Americans are willing to merge their pro-life views with their voting choices. With the 2012 election coming up fast on the horizon, I think it’s fitting to show where our Republican presidential candidates stand on issues like abortion and embryonic stem cell research.

Newt Gingrich – Does not support legal abortion (Pro-life), supports defunding of Planned Parenthood, opposes embryonic stem cell research but recently took this viewpoint

Ron Paul – Reportedly “strongly pro-life”, believes government should not play a role in abortion issue, supports defunding of Planned Parenthood, supports embryonic stem cell research

Mitt Romney – Pro-life and opposes abortion “…except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother.” , believes states should determine their own abortion laws (Instead of federal ban), supports defunding of Planned Parenthood (Yet attended their fundraiser in 2004), opposes embryonic stem cell research

Rick Santorum – CORRECTED:Strongly pro-life, abortion not approved under any circumstances.
(Source: http://2012.republican-candidates.org/Abortion.php)

Here’s an interesting one; Planned Parenthood’s latest marketing scheme for their abortion services has now gone to the extremity of using public figures with legacies. First off we have Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He had an overwhelmingly positive legacy and paid the ultimate price to ensure we are a nation of people who view each other with equality, regardless of race. I think what he did for our nation is extremely admirable and I am extremely grateful for it. However in 1966 at the inauguration of the Margaret Sanger Award, King championed Planned Parenthood’s cause. There’s some debate about whether he knew fully that Planned Parenthood could spiral into the abortion giant it is today, but at the time he helped spur on Planned Parenthood’s morally-troubling philosophy of “family planning”. Normally this kind of stuff would have blown over by now as it was only one speech, he did not spearhead Planned Parenthood’s efforts, but his speech has resurfaced in an effort to promote abortion, as endorsed by admired public figures, on this 2012 Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The fact that Planned Parenthood brings this speech up to promote their philosophy, on a day when we are to be grateful for what this man has done for our nation, scares me. (Link:http://bit.ly/51IErN)

Another celebrity in the news right now for promoting Planned Parenthood’s agenda is Tim Tebow, and this one doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me yet. Read into Tebow’s story and you’ll find that his mother refused to have an abortion and instead he was born a perfectly healthy child and went on to become one of the most popular athletes in the NFL. Seems to me like a strong case for the pro-life cause. However, Planned Parenthood doesn’t have the same line of thinking. Instead, they have warped this story into a case for family planning. In Planned Parenthood President and CEO Cecile Richards’s words, “…the Tebow story exemplifies the health care environment that Planned Parenthood promotes — a world in which women and families are supported in the medical decisions they make for themselves and their families without government interference.” How so? To me, it’s like saying, “We’ll give you the choice to make your decision and whatever you choose is equally weighted, but one has serious negative consequences.” There are flaws in that logic. The particular negative consequence I speak of is the possibility of an unborn baby becoming the next professional athlete or the next Steve Jobs, but never having the chance to because he or she was never granted the right to be born. (Link:http://bit.ly/zQuDdd)

Post your thoughts in the comments, I’d like to hear your input on these stories.

Governor Rick Perry ( R – TX) has suggested a bill on Thursday that would make doctors perform sonograms before they could commit an abortion. They would have to do this a day before and they would have to show the soon-to-be mother the results. The woman would also have to hear the baby’s heartbeat. She can opt out of seeing the sonogram or listening to the heartbeat; however, the baby must be described to her, “…including the existence of legs, arms and internal organs.”

It has received a lot of support from both the Senate and the House of Representatives (2/3 of the members). It will become law as soon as Gov. Perry signs it.

Some states have similar laws, such as Oklahoma; however, there have been criticisms to these laws, since abortion supporters have been saying that the Texas bill “…is designed to dissuade women from seeking abortions… they argue that the state should not interfere with the relationship between a doctor and patient.”

Despite its negative comments, others believe that this bill will be helpful. For example, Rep. Sid Miller (R – TX), the writer of the bill, has stated, “This will be one of the strongest pieces of sonogram legislation in the nation,” and that it would “save numerous unborn lives.”

A note from the author:

                As many Pro-lifers know, Planned Parenthood has been all over the news. Not the news that many people think of. It has not been brought up by any liberal media, such as MSNBC, which plays a large role in the Medias industry.  The news that Planned Parenthood has appeared on is from is from Pro-Life bloggers, Newsletters, Investigative reports from Pro-life organizations, as well as events. I would like to personally thank all those courageous men and woman who are standing up for life, dedicating their time and popularity, and making a struggle that not many people would do.

People may have heard about Planned Parenthoods scandals, but not many people hear about the statistics. When looked at closely, these numbers are shocking as well as disturbing.

  • In 2009, Planned Parenthood alone performed 332,278 abortions
  • In 2009, adoption referrals from Planned P. dropped from 2,405 (in 2008) to a small 977

(In 2009)

  • Abortions outnumber adoption referrals at Planned Parenthood by a 340-1 margin
  • Over 1/3 (33.33%) of Planned Parenthoods revenue comes from abortions
  • 1/3 (33.33%) of Planned Parenthoods revenue comes from tax dollars
  • Over 3million dollars ($3,000,000)are made by Planned Parenthood from taxes per year
  • In 2008, 9,433 clients received parental care from Planned parenthood

In 2009, only 7,021 clients received parental care

  • In 1990, 1.6million abortions were performed in the United States of America. At that time, Planned Parenthood accounted for 8% of that total. Since that time, abortions have decreased by 25%, while the number of abortions that Planned Parenthood performs has increased by over 60%

 

- (All of this information was gained from using several of this websites sources, but for the next part of this article, I had to work on myself from two numbers)

In 2009, only 3%-5% of all women who suffered rape received an abortion (legally)

In 2009, 84,000 women reported rape

In the case of 5%, there would be 4,200 abortions from raped women

In the case 3% there would be 2,520 abortions received by raped women

The FBI was about to have an open and shut case. A Drug Bust in a Planned Parenthood building.  When the broke into the building, what they found was worse than drugs. Much worse. What they found was a room that had the oder of cat urine, and just as filthy. There was blood all over the furniture. In that very building, abortionist Kermit Gosnell was taking the horror of abortion to a new level. Here, the FBI discovered that this so called M.D was killing children after birth, where he then slit there throats. he kept there feet as a “trophy” and had made jokes and comments about the children. Gosnell was charged with eight counts of murder. Seven children died and two women, although both are only one charge. This gives people the idea of what planned parenthood is. A pro-abortion organization that is aiding the death of many unborn, and in this case born, children. This is an organization that must be taken out of business and made publically illegal in all aspects of its dealings.

Last night around midnight, a one-week extension to come to an agreement on the 2011 government budget bill was passed for the United States, therefore avoiding a temporary government shutdown. However, for pro-life citizens there are a few major concerns. First, Planned Parenthood, which performs most of the abortions in the US, will continue to receive federal funding as the Republicans have backed down on this issue. Second, the new bill keeps alive President Obama’s controversial healthcare program which has been a source of heated debate between pro-life Republicans and pro-choice Democrats. However, on the optimistic side, Republicans have managed to push for a ban on using federal and taxpayer funding for abortions in the District of Columbia alone. As pro-life citizens, we must pray and hope for the outcome God has permitted to happen for a reason.

Last Updated: 11 April 2011

I just recently read in a newspaper that Belgium just imposed a new law that requires, if a baby were to be born with a disability, for the death of that child (Abortion) and if not aborted, the doctor is made responsible for the “Wrongful Life” of the child. Just to recap, if a doctor does not order the death of a child, they are legally liable and can be sued! This is crazy! Who’d have though 100 years ago that governments would be murdering their own population under the wrapper of “Its a social service.” Pray for the people of Belgium and especially their leaders, they don’t know what quicksand they’re getting themselves into. Check out the official post about it on the European Institute of Bioethics website at the following URL; it’s in French but the link is Google Translated:

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.ieb-eib.org/fr/bulletins/bulletin-de-lieb-29-novembre-2010-41.html&act=url

If you are pro-choice, or know someone who is, ask this person, or yourself these questions. I promise you, you’ll be amazed.  These questions are worth honestly reflecting on, even if only for a couple of minutes.

1.)  What if your best friend was aborted?

2.)  What if some of your siblings were aborted?

3.)  What if your parents were aborted?

4.)  What if you were aborted?

5.)  What if every mother got an abortion at least once?

Think about these questions for a while. If you think about a loved one, think if they were aborted. Think about what life would be like if they weren’t there. You’d be missing a great deal, no?

As Catholics, we believe abortion is murder in God’s eyes. Wouldn’t these questions have to be asked for murder, the legal definition of it? It’s worth pondering the parallels a bit.